MURUGESAN Vs. SUBRAMANIA GOUNDER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree of the Prl. District Judge, Erode made in A.S.No.188 of 1982 on 30.4.1983.

(2.) THE plaintiff filed a suit on a promissory note contending as follows: -

(3.) BEFORE the II Additional District Munsiff, Erode, who conducted the trial of the suit on behalf of the plaintiff, the plaintiff took the stand as P.W -1 and exhibits A -l to A -7 were marked. The second defendant examined himself as D.W -1 and another witness by name Kandasamy as D.W -2. No document was marked on the side of the defendants. The trial court found the plaintiffs case as having been made out and decreed the suit with costs as prayed for. The defendants aggrieved by the said decision took out the matter in appeal to the District Court, Erode and the prl. District Judge, Erode by his judgment dated 30.4.1983 in A.S.No. 188 of 1982 allowed the appeal in part holding that the promissory note is supported by consideration only to an extent of Rs. 2,500 and decreed accordingly. Hence the second appeal.