S K RAFFUDIN Vs. N YESWANTHA RAO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C. R. P. No. 308 of 1997 arises from R. C. O. P. No. 193 of 1990 and C. R. P. No. 309 of 1997 arises from R. C. O. P. No. 200 of 1990. Both these proceedings were clubbed together by the Rent Controller and a common order was pronounced. When appeals were preferred, the appellate authority also disposed of the appeals by a common judgment.

(2.) IN both the revisions, tenant is the revision petitioner.

(3.) ALL the three respondents in R. C. O. P. No. 193 of 1990 (landlords) filed R. C. O. P. No. 200 of 1990, for eviction of the tenant on three grounds: viz. , (l) That he has defaulted in payment of rent from November. 1989 to July. 1990. A total amount of Rs. 16,200 is due. The default is wilful. (2)The tenant has sub-let the building to one Jalal who is carrying on business in the schedule building. The same is unauthorised and without written consent. (3) The first respondent is an advocate. He has his office in the first floor of the building. He is a heart-patient. He is also suffering from high blood-pressure. Doctors have advised him not to climb staircase. He has no other residential building of his own in the Town. So, for purpose of conducting advocate's office, he requires the schedule building.