LAWS(MAD)-2007-1-34

C PARTHIBAN Vs. K MEENA

Decided On January 20, 2007
SELVI D.AKILA Appellant
V/S
THIRU K.MURUGESAN ATTENDER/LAB ATTENDER FORMERLY AT DEPT. OF SOCIAL WORK AT PRESENT AT DEPARTMENT OF BIO-TECHNOLOGY BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY PALAKALIPERUR TIRUCHIRAPALLI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AGGRIEVED by the order of the learned Single Judge dated 06. 08. 2004 made in W. P. No. 13165 of 2004, the writ petitioners preferred the above writ appeal.

(2.) FOR convenience, we shall refer the parties, as arrayed before the learned single Judge.

(3.) THE case of the petitioners as stated in their affidavit is as follows: the first petitioner, C. Parthiban, is the father of one Selvi P. Shanthi, student of Bharathidasan University, Trichirapalli and the second petitioner Selvi D. Akila, is another student of the same University. The 4th respondent in the writ petition, Dr. S. Palanisamy, was Reader and Head of the Department of Social Works, Bharathidasan University, Trichirapalli. M/s. Selvi. Bharathi and Selvi. P. Shanthi were students of the said Department. The said Bharathi and the 2nd petitioner, D. Akila were students in M. A. (Social Work) and had undergone the course during 2000-2002. The said P. Shanthi was an M. Phil student in Social Work and was doing her research work under the guidance of the research guide Dr. B. Sethuramalingam and the reader who was in-charge of M. Phil course undertaken by the said Shanthi was Dr. S. Palanisamy, 4th respondent. Dr. S. Palanisamy, always did not have a good sense of behaviour towards girl students. The above mentioned girl students and others suffered a lot during the tenure of their course. In order to avoid adverse remarks in their Conduct Certificate/transfer Certificate, they did not lodge any complaint at the relevant point of time. The 2nd petitioner Akila and Selvi. Bharathi had occasion to meet the 4th respondent herein in his chamber and he unnecessarily made them to wait in his chamber for hours together and did not discuss anything about the subject, but put indecent questions for which they being female students would not be able to digest or respond to him. The 4th respondent used to put questions like, "did I catch your hands preventing you from writing the examinations?" and "did I hug you preventing from studying for the examinations?". These are all only few among the numerous statements made by him. On 30. 12. 2002, Selvi. Shanthi had to submit her thesis for approval by respondents 4 and 5 herein and for that, the respondents 4 and 5 called her to the Chamber of 4th respondent and when Shanthi went there, the 4th respondent alone was in his chamber. The 4th respondent left his seat, came towards Shanthi, caught her by his hand, removed her dress and hugged her in a manner which is unbecoming of a Teacher, which could not be borne by any student.