ANBALAGAN Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellants in Crl.A.No.295 of 2015 are the accused 1 and 2 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.347 of 2015 is the third accused in S.C.No.6 of 2009 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Exclusive trial of Bomb Blast cases), Chennai @ Poonamallee. The trial Court framed as many as four charges against the above stated three accused as detailed below:

(2.) The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:

(3.) When the above incriminating materials were put to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C., they denied the same as false. On their side, the wife of the first accused was examined as D.W.1. She has stated about the marriage between her and the first accused. The first accused had examined himself as D.W.2. He has stated that there was no motive for him against the deceased. He has pleaded innocence. Ex.D1 series are the marriage photographs of D.W.1 and D.W.2. Ex.D2 is the marriage invitation. In effect, the accused pleaded that they were innocents. Having considered all the above, the trial Court convicted them as detailed in the first paragraph of this judgment and that is how, the appellants are before this Court with these appeals.