LAWS(MAD)-2016-9-15

K.A.MARY Vs. K.V.ANTHONY

Decided On September 21, 2016
K.A.Mary Appellant
V/S
K.V.Anthony Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The original plaintiff is the appellant. The second appeal is filed challenging the concurrent findings of the Court below in a suit for declaration and title and for the consequential injunction and for a direction to hand over the sale deed of the property or in the alternative, directing the defendant to pay the same to the plaintiff.

(2.) The original plaintiff is the daughter of the original defendant, who is the father. The defendant was allotted a plot of land by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board in 1968 and he has been in possession of the same. Though the father was allotted the plot, he was financially not sound to develop the same by putting up a construction till the year 1983. As there was a move for resumption of the land that were not constructed, the plaintiff helped the defendant by financially assisting him with necessary funds. Therefore, she sold her jewels and raised loan from her friends to the tune of Rs.30,000/ - and put up the foundation of the plot. It is further stated that she was also helping him to pay the monthly instalments to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. As the plaintiff had extended her help in safeguarding the plot, the defendant had executed a registered settlement deed dated 27.04.1984 from which date the plaintiff claims to be in possession.

(3.) Subsequently, the sale was executed by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board in the year 1987. The plaintiff apprehending that her father was trying to alienating the suit property issued a lawyer's notice on 25.01.1998 calling upon him to hand over the sale deed he got from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. In reply, the defendant had mentioned that the said settlement deed dated 27.04.1984 was cancelled by a deed of revocation dated 10.10.1987 which was also registered. According to the plaintiff, the defendant had no right to revoke the settlement deed and the revocation is only with a view to cheat the plaintiff. The settlement deed is acted upon and that the defendant has no right to revoke the same. Hence, the suit has been filed for the reliefs claimed.