LAWS(MAD)-2016-4-214

JOHNSHI MANUEL Vs. J.C.SAMPATH KUMAR

Decided On April 15, 2016
Johnshi Manuel Appellant
V/S
J.C.Sampath Kumar Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The arguments advanced on behalf of the parties are heard. O.S.No.3452/2013 on the file of the XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai came to be filed by J.C.Sampath Kumar and S.Christopher, the respondents 1 and 2 herein for various reliefs of declaration and injunction, including a declaration that the mandate dated 20.10.2012 issued by the third respondent herein (first defendant) from the CSI Synod Secretariat at Chennai to defendant No.9 in the said suit was in contravention of the procedures laid down by the CSI Constitution and hence the same was illegal, unconstitutional and void ab initio.

(2.) The said suit came to be filed by the respondents 1 and 2 herein in their individual capacities, but as persons representing the members of the CSI Central Karnataka Diocese, following the procedure contemplated under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Permission was granted to sue on behalf of numerous persons under Order I Rule 8 CPC in I.A.No.8831/2013. Thereafter, summons were served on the defendants, but they have not filed their written statements. Along with the plaint, an interlocutory application was filed under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC for an interim injunction, pending disposal of the suit, restraining them from giving effect to the selection of defendant No.9 as the Bishop of the 7th defendant on 26.06.2013 and from consecreting or installing defendant No.9 or any one of the defendants 12, 13 and 14 as the Bishop of Karnataka Central Diocese.

(3.) In the said application, after the respondents entered appearance and after hearing both sides, an order of status quo dated 01.07.2013 came to be passed. The said application is I.A.No.8847/2013. Subsequently, the respondents 1 and 2 herein, chose to file a memo dated 23.03.2015 withdrawing the said interlocutory application I.A.No.8847/2013. Meanwhile, Mr.Johnshi Manuel, the revision petitioner herein filed an application in I.A.No.2948/2015 for being impleaded as a party in the suit. While the said application was pending, I.A.No.8847/2013 was sought to be withdrawn and the learned trial Judge, acting on the Memo filed by the respondents 1 and 2 herein, passed the impugned order dated 23.03.2015 dismissing I.A.No.8847/2013 as withdrawn. Subsequent to the said order, the revision petitioner, namely Johnshi Manuel got impleaded as a party in the suit and was ranked as third plaintiff by an order dated 30.04.2015.