K AMARAVATHI Vs. R SUBRAMANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE revision is directed against the order passed by the trial Court in I.A.No.102 of 2005 ordering to implead the proposed party as the 4th defendant (4th respondent herein) in the suit.

(2.) THE revision petitioner has filed the suit for specific performance against the owners of the property on the basis of the sale agreement dated 18.12.2003 said to have been executed by them, complaining that they have failed to perform their part of the contract, which is opposed and the suit is pending.

(3.) THE learned trial Judge, considering all these facts and circumstances of the case and considering the further fact that the proposed party also claims some interest in the property, felt he is proper and necessary party, in which I am unable to find any irregularity to disturb the same. Hence the petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the revision petition is dismissed. No costs. C.M.P.No.14981 of 2005 is closed.