KOPPADI CHINA ANANDAN CHINNA ASIRVADAM Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS Appeal is filed against the judgment dated 15. 4. 1999, made in 14 of 1996 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Pondicherry .

(2.) AGGRIEVED over the conviction for the offence under section 506 Part and sentence of 2 years'Rigourous Imprisonment, this Appeal has

(3.) MR. Balamurugan, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants contended that all the witnesses P. Ws. 1 to 11, P. Ws. 13 and 15 have turned hostile and therefore, both the accused were acquitted of the charges under Sections 302 and 201, I. P. C. According to the learned counsel, there is no evidence for committing the offence under Section 506, Part II, I. P. C. He relied on the judgment in Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. C. Pushparaj, 1998 (1) CTC 300.