SARASAGOPAL Vs. AKSHAYA HOMES

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AGGRIEVED over the order of the learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu made in CMA.No.12 of 2006, in I.A.No.106 of 2006 in O.S.No.21 of 2006, the second defendant in the suit and the second respondent in the CMA has preferred this revision.

(2.) THE brief facts of the case are as follows:-

(3.) PER contra, Mr.G.Masilamani, learned senior counsel appearing for the first respondent/plaintiff would contend that there is no dispute with regard to the item No.1 of the suit properties. As regards item Nos.2 and 3 of the suit properties the possession is with the first respondent/plaintiff and for proving the said possession he has produced documents like Ex.P.11, Patta dated 19.11.2004, Ex.P.13, Patta dated 12.4.2005, Ex.P.14, dated 20.11.2004, Chitta for Fasli 1414 in the name of the third defendant, Ex.P.15, dated 20.11.2004, Adangal for Fasli 1414 in the name of the third defendant, Ex.P.17, dated 21.4.2005, chitta for Fasli 1414, Ex.P.18, dated 21.4.2005, Adangal for Fasli 1414, Ex.P.19, dated 24.8.2005, Urban Land Tax receipt for Fasli 1415, paid by the third defendant, Ex.P.2a, dated 11.3.2005, result of chemical analysis of water obtained from Navalur and Ex.P.28, dated 30.9.2005 Bills for payment to security commandos for the months of September to December 2005.