(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the order of a learned single Judge of this Court in O. P. No. 439 of 1991 concerning the ward named lakshmanan, son of the parties to this proceedings.
(2.) BY the impugned order, the learned Judge directed that the petitioner (father) will have the custody of the son. The mother of the ward has filed this appeal.
(3.) AFTER taking into consideration the entire evidence, both oral and documentary, the learned Judge held that the petitioner is entitled for custody of the minor son.