SIVANANDAM Vs. CHINNASAMY AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AGGRIEVED by the unanimous decisions of the Courts below in a suit for declaration of title and injunction, the plaintiff has preferred the above Second Appeal.

(2.) THIS is a dispute between the members of the family, wherein, the plaintiff, who is one of the sons is fighting against his parents, who are the first and second defendants and his brothers, who are the defendants 3 to 5 and the sister, who is the seventh defendant.

(3.) THE suit was resisted by the defendants, denying all the facts supporting the averments in the plaint. The defendants also denied the oral partition and the other allegations that the suit properties were purchased out of the ancestral income, etc. The first defendant had purchased the said properties on 21.12.1966 and other properties are also purchased by him and he had been in possession of the same. In fact, the said properties are subject matter in S.A. No. 1148 of 2003.