(1.) SINCE the facts and circumstances of the case are one the same in all these Writ Petitions, they are all taken up together and decided by a common order.
(2.) WHILE W.P.(MD).Nos.18823 and 18824 of 2014 has been preferred by M/s. Saisudhir Infrastructures Ltd. and W.P.(MD).Nos.20318 to 20320 of 2014 has been preferred by M/s. IVRCL Ltd., Telugana. Both of them are challenging the action of the respondents in going for a fresh tender for completion of the balance work, which according to the respondents, they have failed to do so, within the stipulated period granted to them. According to the M/s. IVRCL Ltd., Telugana, they have been awarded the contract by the respondents and as per the agreement entered by them, they were directed to complete the said contract work within a stipulated period of mentioned in the contract. Before approaching this Court, according to the petitioner firm, they have completed the contract work awarded to them in the following manner: -
(3.) SIMILARLY , in the other two contracts was awarded to M/s. Saisudhir Infrastructures Ltd., who are the petitioners in W.P.(MD).Nos. 18823 and 18824 of 2014. The said contract should have been completed by the petitioner firm within a period of 18 months including the operation and maintenance for a period of six months. But, according to the petitioner firm, they have completed the contract work awarded to them in the following manner: -