BABY AMMAL Vs. MEHER JAMEEL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE plaintiff preferred this revision petition against the order dated 15.4.1994 made in C.M.P.No.18 of 1994 impleading the 18th defendant (the respondent herein) as a party in the appeal A.S. No.259 of 1993 filed by the petitioner herein against the dismissal of her suit O.S. No.4869 of 1982. THE said 18th defendant was a party in the said suit. But, in the decree in the said suit, it is observed that she remained ex parte in the suit. Presumably on that ground, the plaintiff when she filed A.S. No.259 of 1993 did not implead the 18th defendant as party respondent in the appeal.

(2.) IN the above situation, C.M.P. No.18 of 1994 was filed by the 18th defendant. The court below while passing the order impleading the said 18th defendant has observed as follows: