(1.) This review application has been filed contending that the judgment under review requires a reconsideration in the light of law laid down in 1996 (5) SCC 48 [Pattam Khader Khan vs. Pattam Sardar Khan]and 2017(6) CTC 602 [T.Muthukumarasamy vs. J. Selvasundarraj] and that in the light of the above two judgments, there appears to be an error apparent on the face of the record and there are sufficient reasons for seeking a review of the judgment.
(2.) In the judgment under review, the judgments above referred to have not been brought to the notice of this Court and relying on the judgment reported in 2004 (4) CTC 148 [Ratan Bapu Patil (dead) by Lrs and Others Vs. Dodhu and Others], the second appeal has been dismissed.
(3.) In the light of the submissions made, the judgment which is the subject matter of this review petition requires to be reviewed and accordingly, the review application is allowed. Both the learned counsels have made their submissions in the main second appeal itself.