REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

K. Pitchaimani Appellant

V/S

The Secretary to Government Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

GOVIND RAM PUROHIT AND ANOTHER V. JAGJIWAN CHANDRA AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
J.JEBA MARY V. THE CHAIRMAN,TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD [REFERRED TO]
K C SHARMA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
BALBIR KAUR VS. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
BALBIR KAUR VS. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. G HALAPPA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. N PARAMESHWARAPPA [REFERRED TO]
MAHARAJ KRISHAN BHATT VS. STATE OF JANDK [REFERRED TO]
T MEER ISMAIL ALI VS. TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD [REFERRED TO]
R ANBARASI VS. CHIEF ENGINEER PERSONNEL [REFERRED TO]
N S BALASUBRAMANIAN VS. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
M UMA VS. CHIEF ENGINEER PERSONNEL TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD [REFERRED TO]
MOHANAMBAL VS. DIRECTOR LAND AND SURVEY DEPARTMENT [REFERRED TO]
G SARAVANAKUMAR VS. CHAIRMAN TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD [REFERRED TO]
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER VS. V JAYA [REFERRED TO]
SYED KHADIM HUSSAIN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
P.SATHIARAMAN VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CHALLENGE in this Writ Petition is to the order, dated 08.12.2011, rejecting the request of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground and for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to give employment on compassionate ground, commensurate to his educational qualification.

(2.) THE case of the petitioner is that his father, by name, V.Kannadichamy, while working as Office Assistant died, on 18.11.1992 in harness, leaving behind the petitioner, his mother, and sister. At the time of death of his father, the petitioner was a minor, studying sixth standard. Since his mother did not possess the required educational qualification, she could not apply for appointment on compassionate ground. After attaining majority and possessing required qualification, the petitioner submitted a representation, dated 21.03.2003, before the third respondent seeking appointment on compassionate ground. The third respondent, by the impugned order, dated 08.12.2011, rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that the application was not made within a period of three years from the date of death of the employee. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

(3.) THE learned counsel, in support of his contention, makes reliance upon the following Judgments: -

Click here to view full judgment.

K. PITCHAIMANI Vs. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address