REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

YASUDDIN Appellant

V/S

INSPECTOR OF POLICE Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

KAMARAJ GOUNDAR VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
RADHA BALLABH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
SAJJAN SINGH VS. EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]
MUTHUSWAMI VS. STATE OF MADRAS [REFERRED TO]
BUDHSEN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHEO RAM [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. K VENKATA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
WAKIL SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. M V RAMANA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
THAKORE DOLJI VANVIRJI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
SATRUGHANA ALIAS SATRUGHANA PARIDA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
RAMANAND RAMNATH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MEHBUB SAMSUDDIN MALEK VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
VIJAYAN ALIAS RAJAN K V SADANANDAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH GOVIND JAGESHA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
DAYA SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
DANA YADAV VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
MALKHANSINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
ANWAR VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
CHOTEYLAL VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellants are A-1 to A-3. They were tried along with A-1 to A-8 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC for having committed the murder of one Palanisamy @ Kannan. The appellants (A-1 to A-3) alone were convicted for the offences under Sections 148 and 302 IPC. Other accused were acquitted of the charges. Challenging the said conviction, this appeal has been filed by the appellants, namely A-1 to A-3.

(2.) SHORT facts leading to the conviction are as follows:

(3.) MR. V. GOPINATH, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the first appellant/a-1, while assailing the impugned judgment, would make the following contentions:

Click here to view full judgment.

YASUDDIN Vs. INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address