S RAVINDRAN Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These three petitions for the issue of writs of habeus corpus for the release of the three detenus, are heard together in view of their similarity.

(2.) In all these three writ petitions, the only ground urged by Mr. Ramalingam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, is that the materials which formed the basis for detention were not communicated to the detenus in the language known to them, viz, Tamil.

(3.) In W.P. No. 6594 of 1982, one Arumugham is the detenu. In para (xi) of the grounds of detention served on him, it is stated as follows :-