R.SUDHA Vs. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. R.Venkatesan, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Ms. M.Aasha, Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondents and perused the materials placed on record apart from the pleadings of the parties.

(2.) The Writ Petition has been filed for directing the Respondents to release the vehicle of the Petitioner bearing registration no. TN 59 CJ 9239 which has been seized by the Third Respondent.

(3.) It has been brought to notice by Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondents that a case in Crime No. 32 of 2023 has been registered on 16/1/2023 against Rajkamal, who is the husband of the Petitioner, under Ss. 4(1) (aa) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 and copy of the First Information Report has been sent to the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai. In that backdrop, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition reserving the rights of the Petitioner to file necessary application for return of property under Ss. 451 and 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for return of property before the jurisdictional Criminal Court and she has filed a memo to that effect, which has been placed on record.