LAWS(MAD)-2013-11-4

N. APPUSAMY Vs. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

Decided On November 04, 2013
N. Appusamy Appellant
V/S
PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Challenge in this appeal is the order in W.P.No.21947 of 2009 (18.10.2011) declining to quash the impugned Proceedings in Ref.No.A2/69295/08 dt. 03.9.2009 and also declining to issue direction to the Respondents for inclusion of Appellant's name in the panel of Rangers fit for promotion as Assistant Conservator of Forests by recruitment by transfer for the year 1998-99 and grant all consequential service and monetary benefits.

(2.) Facts leading to filing of Writ Petition are as follows:-

(3.) Appellant submitted a representation dt. 12.12.2008 to the 1st Respondent claiming promotion to include his name in the panel of the year 1998-99. As there was no response, Appellant has filed Writ Petition in W.P.No.14095 of 2009 seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to pass orders on his representation dt. 12.12.2008. Even in the admission stage, by the order dated 27.3.2009 the said Writ Petition was disposed of with a direction, directing the Respondents to consider Appellant's representation dated 12.12.2008 and pass orders on merit in accordance with law. In furtherance of the direction in W.P.No.14095 of 2009, 1st Respondent issued the impugned Proceedings in Ref.No.A2/69295/08 dt. 3.9.2009 rejecting the claim of the Appellant for inclusion of his name in the panel of Rangers fit for promotion as Assistant Conservator of Forests for the year 1998-99 on the ground that Appellant has not completed discipline of service in Corporation as well as in Non Sensitive posts as prescribed in Rule 4(3) of Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Forest Service and also the Appellant had currency of punishment imposed by the Managing Director, TAFCORN, Trichy in Proceedings No.3039/95/E2 dt. 19.11.1997 which lies within the check period for the preparation of panel for the year 1998-99 and Appellant's claim has been denied. Challenging the said Proceedings dt. 3.9.2009, Appellant has filed the Writ Petition in W.P.No.21947 of 2009. Along with W.P.No.21947 of 2009, Appellant has also filed another Writ Petition in W.P.No.21946 of 2009 challenging the punishment imposed on him vide Proceedings No.3039/97/E2 dt. 19.11.1997 and confirmed by the Appellate Authority.