REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Anitha Radhakrishnan Appellant

V/S

Pr. Manoharan Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

KALYANSINGH CHAUHAN VS. JOSHI [REFERRED TO]
BHIKAJI KESHAO JOSHI VS. BRIJLAL NANDLAL BIYANI [REFERRED TO]
MURARKA RADBEY SHYAM KAM KUMAR VS. ROOP SINGH RATHORE [REFERRED TO]
JAGAT KISHORE PRASAD NARAIN SINGH VS. RAJENDRA KUMAR PODDAR [REFERRED TO]
HARDWARI LAL VS. KANWAL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
M KAMALAM VS. V A SYED MOHAMMED [REFERRED TO]
K M MANI JOSEPH THOMAS VS. P J ANTONY:P J ANTONY [REFERRED TO]
SHARIF UD DIN VS. ABDUL GANI LONE [REFERRED TO]
M KARUNANIDHI R RANGASAMI A CHINNADURAI R PERIASAMY A CHINDRASEKHARAN VS. H V HANDE AND OTHRS:C R RAJAPPA:V PERUMAL NAINAR:T P K JAYARAJ:P S MANIAN [REFERRED TO]
MITHILESH KUMAR PANDEY VS. BAIDYANATH YADAV [REFERRED TO]
RAM SARUP GUPTA VS. BISHUN NARAIN INTER COLLEGE [REFERRED TO]
GAJANAN KRISHNAJI BAPAT VS. DATTAJI RAGHOBAJI MEGHE [REFERRED TO]
SHIPRA JHAMMAKLAL VS. SHANTI LAL KHOIWAL:LAXMINARAYANPANDE [REFERRED TO]
R P MOIDUTTY VS. P T KUNJU MOHAMMAD [REFERRED TO]
V NARAYANASWAMY VS. C P THIRUNAVUKKARASU [REFERRED TO]
V NARAYANASWAMY VS. C P THIRUNAVUKKARASU [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDER SINGH VS. JANMEJA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDER SINGH VS. JANMEJA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
KAMALNATH VS. SUDESH VERMA [REFERRED TO]
MICHAEL B FERNANDES VS. C K JAFFER SHARIEF [REFERRED TO]
MAHADEORAO SIKAJI SHIVANKAR VS. RAMARATAN BAPU [REFERRED TO]
SARDAR HARCHARAN SINGH BRAR VS. SUKH DARSHAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
BACHHAJ NAHAR VS. NILIMA MANDAL [REFERRED TO]
BACHHAJ NAHAR VS. NILIMA MANDAL [REFERRED TO]
RAM SUKH VS. DINESH AGGERWAL [REFERRED TO]
KALYAN SINGH CHOUHAN VS. C P JOSHI [REFERRED TO]
PONNALA LAKSHMAIAH VS. KOMMURI PRATAP REDDY [REFERRED TO]
K MURALEEDHARAN VS. V V RAGHAVAN [REFERRED TO]
FAIZAL VS. USSAINAR KUNHI [REFERRED TO]
P CHIDAMBARAM VS. R S RAJA KANNAPPAN [REFERRED TO]
G.M. SIDDESHWAR VS. PRASANNA KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
NEENA VIKRAM VERMA VS. BALMUKUND SINGH GAUTAM [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The applicant herein is the first respondent in the above election petition and the returned candidate. He has filed the application in O.A.No. 748 of 2012 to reject the election petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and other in O.A.No.5 of 2013 to permit him to produce the documents annexed therewith. The Election Petitioner in E.L.P.No.8 of 2011 is the first respondent in both these applications.

(2.) The election petitioner filed the above election petition seeking for declaration of the returned candidate viz., the applicant in these applications, from Thiruchendur Assembly Constituency in the election held on 13.4.2011 as void; for ordering re-scrutiny of the voting results recorded in the 210 electronic voting machines used for counting in the above said Assembly Constituency; for ordering repolling of 891 postal ballot papers ; to declare the election petitioner as duly elected member of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly from the above said Constituency and for payment of costs and for other suitable reliefs.

(3.) The case of the election petitioner in the election petition is briefly stated as follows:-

Click here to view full judgment.

ANITHA RADHAKRISHNAN Vs. PR. MANOHARAN

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address