M EASWARAMOORTHY Vs. C EASWARAMOORTHY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

(2.) The said transfer O.P. had been resisted by the first respondent after filing a counter statement. The complainants never threatened the petitioners while they are attending the Courts at Erode. If 18 cases were transferred to Kangayanm, the complainants and their 36 witnesses have to travel from Erode to Kangayam. All the witnesses are bank officers, who are also Government employees and their official work will be affected if they go to Kangayam Court to give evidence.

(3.) The fourth and ninth respondent also filed counter statement and opposed the transfer petition in the same way. After hearing the arguments of all sides and on perusing the averments of the parties, the learned judge dismissed the said transfer petition.