(1.) HEARD the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
(2.) IN the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus for quashing the order dated 27.02.2001 and to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to absorb the petitioner as helper with effect from 27.10.1999 with all monetary and consequential benefits.
(3.) THE respondents have filed counter wherein it is indicated that the identity of the person who were working as contract labourers had been verified through a committee and since the name of the person who was given as A.Kandasamy in the Transfer Certificate of the School whereas in the service certificate it has been given as A.Gopi, such person was not appointed. It has also been stated that the petitioner subsequently changing the name of A.Gopi would not bind the Board. In course of hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents also took a plea that since the question of identity is a disputed question of fact, this is not a fit case where the writ jurisdiction by the High Court should be entertained.