LAWS(MAD)-2003-6-123

DORAISAMY M Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Decided On June 27, 2003
DORAISAMY M Appellant
V/S
STATE OF TAMIL NADU Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner was serving under the Khadi & Village Industries Board, the second respondent. A departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner in March, 1989 and an order was passed on July 31, 1989 directing recovery of Rs.6,27,521/-. The petitioner filed WP No. 12160 of 1989. By order dated February 1, 1990, the said writ petition was allowed and the order dated July 31, 1989 was quashed solely on the ground that reasonable opportunity had not been given to the petitioner and principles of natural justice had been violated. Thereafter the Chief Executive Officer of Tamil Nadu Khadi & Village Industries Board passed final order dated September 29, 1985 in Rc.No.50689/ E3(2)/88 terminating the petitioner from service. As against the said order, the petitioner filed appeal before the Commissioner and the Special Secretary to the Government raising various contentions. By a laconic order dated February 8, 1999 passed by the Secretary to the Government, such appeal has been dismissed. A perusal of said order, which has been translated in English, indicates that apart from narrating the brief history, no reason has been given by the respondent No. 1, except stating that no new grounds had been raised in the appeal.

(2.) In the present writ petition, various contentions had been advanced challenging the order passed by the respondents 1 and 2 including the ground that the appellate authority has mechanically dismissed the appeal without giving any reasons for the same.

(3.) The right of filing appeal is statutory in nature. In the absence of any limitation in the statutory provision providing for filing of appeal, the jurisdiction of the appellate authority is as wide as that of the original authority and the appellate authority has the jurisdiction as well as the duty to consider the entire matter afresh in accordance with law on the basis of the materials on record. The appellate authority even in a departmental proceeding has to state the reasons for the conclusions arrived at by it.