REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

K UMAPATHY Appellant

V/S

A C ABRAHAM KINSELY Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

PIRGONDA HONGONDA PATIL VS. KALGONDA SHIDGONDA PATIL [REFERRED TO]
ANIGLASE YOHANNAN VS. RAMLATHA [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL VS. K K MODI [REFERRED TO]
M MEENAKSHI VS. METADIN AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
AJENDRAPRASADJI N PANDE VS. SWAMI KESHAVPRAKESHDASJI N [REFERRED TO]
USHA DEVI VS. RIJWAN AHAMD [REFERRED TO]
CHANDER KANTA BANSAL VS. RAJINDER SINGH ANAND [REFERRED TO]
NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION GORAKHPUR VS. BHAGWAN DAS [REFERRED TO]
RAJKUMAR GURAWARA VS. S K SARWAGI AND CO PVT LTD [REFERRED TO]
VIDYABAI VS. PADMALATHA [REFERRED TO]
SURENDER KUMAR SHARMA VS. MAKHAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
REVAJEETU BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS VS. NARAYANASWAMY AND SONS [REFERRED TO]
MAN KAUR VS. HARTAR SINGH SANGHA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
J SAMUEL VS. GATTU MAHESH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 23.12.2011 in I.A.No.10304 of 2011 in O.S.No.5511 of 2010, on the file of the II Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

(2.) THE defendant in the suit is the revision petitioner herein. The suit has been filed by the respondent/plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner/defendant, his men, agents, servants or anybody authorised through the defendant from in any manner carrying out construction work in the common passage ad-measuring 337.5 square feet situate in T.S.No.4692 of Block No.105 in No.112, T.Nagar Village, morefully described in Schedule C.

(3.) THE petitioner/defendant has filed counter affidavit to the said I.A. praying for amendment of the plaint, stating as follows:

Click here to view full judgment.

K UMAPATHY Vs. A C ABRAHAM KINSELY

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address