(1.) THE claimant in M.C.O.P.No.179 of 2001, dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation amount, directed this appeal.
(2.) ACCORDING to the learned counsel for the appellant, actually the rider of TVS-50 alone was responsible for the accident. However, the Tribunal had wrongly put 40% of the blame on the appellant and deducted 40% of the amount from the compensation amount. Further, less amount has been awarded as compensation.
(3.) THE Tribunal recorded a finding that since in this accident two vehicles are involved, the appellant had also contributed to the accident and apportioned the negligence in the ratio of 40% and 60%. So, from the total compensation of Rs.90,000/-, it had deducted 40% and awarded only Rs.54,000/ to the appellant.