(1.) THE assessee in both these revision cases is the same. THE controversy revolves around the assessment in respect of waste cotton for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79. THE assessing authority as well as the appellate authority treated the waste cotton purchased by the assessee and consumed by it in its mill for manufacture of low count yarn as inferior cotton and held the same liable to tax under section4 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales tax Act at the point of last purchase of cotton. THE assessee went up in appeal in both the cases to the Tribunal. THE Tribunal, after detailed consideration, came to the conclusion on facts that what the assessee had purchased was not "inferior cotton" but only "waste cotton". THE Tribunal accordingly found that so far as the "cotton waste" which had been purchased by the assessee is concerned, it was liable to tax only on the first sale point in the State under item 16 of First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu general Sales Tax Act. Thus for the assessment year 1977-78 on the basis of the material on record, the assessment in respect of the purchase of "cotton waste" was modified to Rs. 3, 41, 740. 40, while for the assessment year 1978-79 it was modified to Rs. 3, 29, 658. 22. In respect of balance out of the disputed amount, since the assessee could not produce any evidence or material to show that what it had purchased was only "cotton waste" the assessment in respect of that turnover was confirmed.
(2.) THE only meaningful question which we are called upon to decide at this stage is as to whether the "waste cotton" purchased by the assessee is a commodity distinct from "cotton" and further whether it is "inferior cotton" at all.