LAWS(MAD)-2021-2-170

T. K. S. PUGAZHENDHI Vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

Decided On February 23, 2021
T. K. S. Pugazhendhi Appellant
V/S
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their names.

(2.) On a complaint lodged by the General Manager, State Bank of India (SBI), Chennai, the CBI registered an FIR in Crime No.RC.05/E/2018-BS & FC/BLR on 21.03.2018 for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC read with Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, against M/s.Kanishk Gold Pvt. Ltd. (in short "KGPL"), Chennai and five named accused. The sum and substance of the allegations in the FIR is that, during 2011, a consortium of 14 banks with SBI as the lead bank, had sanctioned working capital credit facilities which KGPL (A1) had allegedly diverted, resulting in loss to the banks to the tune of Rs.824.15crores as on 31.12.2017. Since the FIR disclosed the commission of a 'schedule offence' under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short "the PML Act"), the Enforcement Directorate registered a case in ECIR No.CEZOI/07/2018 on 22.03.2018, conducted investigation under the PML Act, collected materials and filed a complaint in C.C.No.13 of 2018 in the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Court), Chennai, against KGPL (A1), Bhoopesh Kumar Jain (A2), Mohanlal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. (in short "MJPL") (A3), Suresh Khatri (A4) and T.K.S.Pugazhendhi (A5) for the offence under Section 3 read with 4 of the PML Act, for quashing which, Pugazhendhi (A5) is before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

(3.) Heard Mr.N.Ramakrishnan for M/s.Waron and Sai Rams, learned counsel for Pugazhendhi (A5) and Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan, learned Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr.N.Ramesh, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the Enforcement Directorate.