LAWS(MAD)-2021-11-136

CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED Vs. MADHU SOMANI

Decided On November 12, 2021
CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED Appellant
V/S
Madhu Somani Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant suit has been filed seeking for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, her servants, agents or anyone claiming through the defendant, from manufacturing, marketing, distributing, offering, advertising for sale of any pharmaceutical preparation using the trade mark ATORLITE, which is deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade marks ATOR and ATORVA and for other consequential reliefs.

(2.) The case of the plaintiff is that they are one of the leading pharmaceutical companies manufacturing and marketing pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals products. The further case of the plaintiff is that they coined and adopted distinctive trade marks ATOR and ATORVA, under which the plaintiff manufactures and markets medicinal preparations. The plaintiff applied for registration of the trade marks ATOR and ATORVA and obtained the trade mark registration. It is further stated that the plaintiff is using this trade mark since 1999 continuously and the plaintiff has also given the sales figure of the mark for a period of 9 years from 2003-2004 to 2011-2012, in order to establish that they have made substantial sales by using this trade mark. The grievance of the plaintiff is that the defendant used a mark ATORLITE, which is deceptively similar to the trade mark of the plaintiff and thereby is causing confusion to the consumers and is dishonestly earning profits by misusing the goodwill and reputation of the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff has knocked the doors of this Court, seeking for various reliefs.

(3.) The defendant who entered appearance through their counsel, failed to file written statement in spite of several opportunities given to the defendant. This Court took into consideration the fact that the defendant did not file a written statement even after six years from the date of institution of this suit and consequently by an order dtd. 16/12/2019, forfeited the right of the defendant from filing the written statement. Hence, the defendant has not set up any defense on her side.