AYYAPAN Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Criminal Revision Case is filed against the judgment dated 23.8.2007 in Crl.A.No.2 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court-cum-Fast Track Court No.2, Cuddalore, confirming the judgment dated 5.1.2005 in C.C.No.89 of 2001 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate's Court No.3, Cuddalore.

(2.) THE skeleton of the case of the prosecution is as follows:

(3.) LEARNED Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-Police submitted that even though P.Ws.1 and 2 turned hostile, P.W.3 complainant is the victim and his evidence is cogent, natural, trustworthy and reliable and on the basis of the evidence of P.W.3, the trial Court came to the conclusion that the revision petitioner/A-1 is guilty of the offence under Section 326 IPC. LEARNED Government Advocate further submitted that P.W.6 Radiologist and P.W.7 Doctor were examined to prove that P.W.3 sustained grievous injuries. He further stated that P.W.5 is one of the attestors of the observation mahazar. The trial Court and the first appellate Court considered all the aspects in proper perspective and the impugned judgments of the Courts below do not warrant any interference and prayed for dismissal of the Crl.R.C.