LAWS(MAD)-2020-7-208

R.PARIMALA Vs. DEAN

Decided On July 21, 2020
R.Parimala Appellant
V/S
DEAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner's sister's daughter (Minor) Durgadevi, is a victim in Crime No.7 of 2020 on the file of the fifth respondent Police registered for the offence under Sections 4, 5(i)(ii), 5(n) and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012. According to the petitioner, after the demise of the victim girl's mother, taking advantage of the family situation, the father and grandfather of the victim girl committed the crime against her. Due to the offence committed upon the victim girl, she got pregnant and she is now 7 months pregnant. Since the victim is a Minor girl, aged about 15 years, the petitioner has moved the authorities to terminate the pregnancy of her sister's minor daughter, as it would affect her both physically and mentally. Alleging inaction on the part of the authorities, she has filed the instant Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent / Dean, Thanjavur Medical College and Hospital, Thanjavur, to terminate the pregnancy of her sister's minor daughter.

(2.) Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner took the victim girl in Raja Mirasudar Hospital, Thanjavur and the victim was subjected for medical examination by the Doctor. The Doctor, after examination, opined that the victim was 7 months pregnant. Based on the complaint given by the petitioner's sister's daughter, a case in Crime No.7 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 4, 5(i)(ii), 5(n) and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012, has been registered against the accused. Thereafter, the petitioner took the victim girl to the Government Hospital at Thanjavur and requested them to terminate the unwanted pregnancy. They have admitted her in the Hospital, but refused to terminate the pregnancy, because of the registration of a criminal case. Further, one Indirani, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Govt. Raja Mirasudar Hospital, Thanjavur, examined the said victim girl and in view of her physical and mental health condition, suggested for terminating the pregnancy. Based on this report, the District Child Protection Officer has addressed a letter to the District Legal Services Authority, Thanjavur, requesting appropriate action, but there was no further progress. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, delay in taking any decision for terminating the pregnancy would affect the victim badly and therefore, prays for allowing this petition.

(3.) Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.