TSENTHTL KUMAR Vs. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition is to set aside the orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Namakkal, in C.M.P. No. 632 of 2000 on 7 -3 -2000 refusing to give interim custody of the Van bearing Registration No. TN 39A 6886.

(2.) THIS petition has arisen in this way: The petitioner is the owner of the vehicle in question. On 2 -2 -2000 while he was travelling in the van alongwith the driver the accused waylaid, kidnapped the petitioner and committed theft of the van regarding which a complaint was preferred before the first respondent who registered a case in Crime No. 161 of 2000. The case is pending investigation. According to the petitioner, he is the owner of the vehicle the registration certificate stands in his name the accused abducted .him and forcibly obtained his signature in some blank court -fee stamp papers and blank stamp papers and also in the transfer form now the van is lying exposed to elements and it is deteriorating. According to the petitioner he being the owner the van should be returned to him.

(3.) THE learned Judicial Magistrate held that because there are rival claimants interim custody cannot be granted to the petitioner. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, the petitioner has come forward with the instant petition.