K MOKKAMAYAN Vs. P PUSHPARANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE revision petition is directed against the order dated 7.12.1999 in O.S. No. 154 of 1997 on the file of District Munsif, Periyakulam.

(2.) FIRST defendant in that suit is the petitioner in this revision. Respondents herein filed the said suit for bare injunction. The petitioner herein/lst defendant therein filed a written statement disputing the claim made by the plaintiff and also denied the allegation that the plaintiff purchased the suit property through a registered sale deed dated 12.2.1985. It is also contended that plaintiff does not have title or possession over the suit property. He also specifically pleaded that he has been in physical possession and enjoyment as pathway for more than the statutory period and such possession and enjoyment was open, hostile and uninterupted one, and perfected his title by adverse possession.

(3.) IN the light of what is stated above, I do not find any error or infirmity in the impugned order. Consequently, the civil revision petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs.