(1.) xxx xxx xxx.
(2.) As is clear from the grounds of detention, it is not stated whether any action was taken for cancellation of bail which was granted by a competent Court and that in spite of such an action, the detenu continued his anti-social activities. A similar question arose before a Division Bench of this Court in Zubedabibi Rasidkhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat & Ors. 1995 36 (2) GLR 1134. There also the detenu was enlarged on bail and there was non-consideration on the part of the detaining authority as to whether any action was taken to get the bail cancelled. The Division Bench observed in paragraph 5 as under:
(3.) xxx xxx xxx.