(1.) MR. Adil Mehta, learned advocate appearing for the accused no. 1 has stated that the accused has already undergone the sentence imposed upon him. In that view of the matter, Criminal Appeal No. 67 of 1997 has become academic.
(2.) THE brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:
(3.) IT was contended by Mr. Kodekar, learned APP that the judgement and order of the Sessions Court is against the provisions of law; the Sessions Court has not properly considered the evidence led by the prosecution and looking to the provisions of law itself it is established that the prosecution has proved the whole ingredients of the evidence against the present respondents. Learned APP has also taken this court through the oral as well as the entire documentary evidence.