(1.) Heard Mr. Raval, learned advocate for petitioner and learned advocate for respondent.
(2.) The award dated 10.7.2015 passed by learned Industrial Tribunal at Rajkot in Reference No.197 of 2006 is challenged in present petition.
(3.) So far as factual backdrop is concerned, it has emerged from the record and from rival submissions by learned advocate for the contesting parties that the petitioner appointed present respondent as driver, in 1968. At the time when the respondent came to be appointed the employer (present petitioner) entered certain details, including the date of birth of the respondent, in its record.