LAWS(GJH)-2018-7-51

PRITESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI BHAKT Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Decided On July 02, 2018
Priteshkumar Rasikbhai Bhakt Appellant
V/S
STATE OF GUJARAT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This application is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' for the sake of brevity) for quashing and setting aside the FIR being C.R.No.I-67 of 2011 registered with Vyara police station and proceedings filed pursuant thereto.

(2.) Heard learned advocate Mr.Zubin Bharda for the applicant, learned advocate Mr.N.K.Majmudar for the respondent no.2- complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.Devnani for the respondent-State.

(3.) Learned advocate Mr.Bharda has referred to the allegations made in the impugned FIR, copy of which is produced at page 23 of the compilation. The said FIR is filed for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 114 of Indian Penal Code. The impugned FIR is filed on 6.6.2011. It has been mainly alleged in the said FIR by the respondent no.2- complainant that land bearing block no.92, 93, 109/1 situated at Mouje Meghpur, Taluka Vyara, District Tapi was in the name of accused no.2 and the land bearing block no.108 situated at Mouje Meghpur Ta.Vyara, was in the name of accused no. The said aspect was informed to him by accused nos.1 and It is also stated by concerned accused that the title of the said land is clear. The complainant therefore purchased the land in question by registered sale deed by payment of consideration on 15.4.2009 and 15.6.2009 respectively and thereby he became the owner of the land in question. It is further stated that after the execution of the sale deed, it was revealed that the accused have created the charge on the land in question and thereafter accused nos.2 and 3 executed the power of attorney in favour of accused no.1. The accused no.1, on the basis of the said power of attorney, executed agreement to sell on 29.1.2010. The same was registered and thereby accused have created forged documents and committed the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 114 of Indian Penal Code. The complainant has also referred to the pendency of civil and RTS proceedings between the parties.