(1.) The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2003 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, (Senior Division) Gondal in Regular Civil Suit No. 128 of 1999 and also against the judgment and order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the learned 11 th Additional District Judge, Gondal in Regular Civil Appeal No. 31 of 2007.
(2.) The brief background of present Second Appeal is that the appellants original plaintiffs have filed a suit in the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Gondal which was registered as Special Civil Suit No. 128 of 1999 against the defendants i.e. defendant no. 1 is the father, defendants nos. 2 and 3 are the real brothers and defendants nos. 4 and 5 are the sistersinlaw, who happened to be wives of defendants nos. 2 and 3. Essentially, the suit was filed for the purpose of seeking partition of the ancestral property of defendant no. 1 who is the father of the plaintiffs and consequential relief is sought to set aside the registered sale transaction which took place on 16.10.1999 executed by the father i.e. defendant no. 1 in favour of the sistersinlaw i.e. defendants nos. 4 and 5.
(3.) The appeal was initially entertained by this Court by issuing notice on 01.04.2015 by further directing to maintain statusquo with regard to the disputed property and thereafter, the matter has travelled till date and on 17.01.2018 the Second Appeal was taken up for hearing in which, learned advocate Mr. Nirad Buch appearing for Nanavaty Advocates has represented the present appellants - original plaintiffs and learned advocate Ms. Archana Acharya has represented respondents nos. 1 to 4 and with this background, the Second Appeal is heard at length.