(1.) By way of this Appeal, the present appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 12th August, 1993 whereby the present-respondents, original-accused are acquitted against prosecution under Section (18)(a)(1) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 [hereinafter referred to as Sthe Act ] .
(2.) The brief facts of the prosecution case are as under;
(3.) To prove the case of adulteration of drug of which the sample was purchased, the Prosecution has examined the following witnesses;