LAWS(GJH)-2025-4-146

STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. ABDUL MALIK

Decided On April 04, 2025
STATE OF GUJARAT Appellant
V/S
ABDUL MALIK Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal has been filed by the appellant - State under Sec. 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') against the judgment and the order dtd. 24/12/2008 in Special Atrocity Case No.15 of 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge, Fast Track Court, Bharuch, camp at Ankleshwar (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned Trial Court'), whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents - accused from the offences punishable under Ss. 504, 452, 323, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the IPC') and Sec. 3(1)(10) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Atrocity Act'). 1.1. The respondents are hereinafter referred to as 'the accused' as they stood in the rank and file in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.

(2.) The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:

(3.) Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Court, the appellant - State has filed the present appeal mainly stating that the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Court is contrary to law, evidence on record and principles of justice. The learned learned Trial Court has not properly appreciated the oral as well as documentary evidence on record it its true spirit. The learned Trial Court has erred in acquitting the accused through there are ample and cogent evidence to connect the accused with the crime and the offences registered against them. The learned Trial Court has also committed an error in arriving at the conclusion that though the complainant and the prosecution witnesses have fully supported the case of the prosecution and there are no material contradictions, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the accused. The impugned judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Trial Court is illegal, invalid, improper, perverse and bad in law and the same deserves to be quashed and set aside.