REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

INDRAVIJAYSINH BHIKHUBHA GOHIL Appellant

V/S

STATE OF GUJARAT Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

R. V. CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE THAMES VALLEY POLICE FORCES EXP. COTTON [REFERRED TO]
A.M.ALLISON V. B.L.SEN [REFERRED TO]
GADDE VENKATESWARA RAO V. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MCCARTHY V.GRANT [REFERRED TO]
RIDGE V. BALDWIN [REFERRED TO]
MEGARRY J.IN JOHN V. REES [REFERRED TO]
LORD WOOLF IN LLOYD V. MCMAHON [REFERRED TO]
MALLOCH V. ABERDEEN CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
MALLOCH V. ABERDEEN CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
GLYNN V. KEELEE UNIVERSITY [REFERRED TO]
CINNAMOND V. BRITISH AIRPORT AUTHORITY [REFERRED TO]
R.V.EALING MAGISTRATES' COURT EXP. FANNARAN [REFERRED TO]
NEW PRAKASH TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED VS. NEW SUWARNA TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
NAGENDRA NATH BORA LIKHIRAM COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM RAFIULLAH KHAN VS. COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM:BHANURAM PAGU:BHANURAM PEGU:AMULYA PRASAD CHALIHA [REFERRED TO]
MANEKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
K L TRIPATHI VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA UNION OF INDIA BISWAROOP CHATTERJEE ACHINTA KUMAR BISWAS NABENDU BOSE LAXMI NARAYAN VS. TULSIRAM PATEL:SADANAND JHA:G P KOUSHAL:UNION OF INDIA:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF PATIALA VS. S K SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
M C MEHTA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY VS. MANSOOR ALI KHAN [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition is directed against the order passed by respondent no.1 dated 8.4.2005 whereby the State of Gujarat cancelled the nomination of the petitioner as Member of the Executive Council of the respondent Bhavnagar University by the Vice-Chancellor from 7.11.2003 in exercise of power under section 18(1)(iii) of the Act read with Statutes framed under the Act.

(2.) The short facts of the case as emerging from the petition are as under:

(3.) Being aggrieved by the nomination of the petitioner as a Member of the Executive Council by the Vice-Chancellor of Respondent University, the respondent No.4 made a Reference Application to the State of Gujarat against the Vice-Chancellor on 17.11.2003. Since action of university was challenged, only University was joined as party respondent and the petitioner was not joined as a party to the Reference Application. It may not be out of place to notice that proceedings pending before the State Government were not known to the petitioner.

Click here to view full judgment.

INDRAVIJAYSINH BHIKHUBHA GOHIL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address