(1.) Heard learned advocate Ms. Mamta Vyas for the petitioner, learned advocate Ms. Dharmishta Raval for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Suman Motla for respondent No.3 - State.
(2.) The brief facts of the present case are as under :
(3.) Being aggrieved with the order dtd. 20/7/2009, the petitioner preferred appeal before the competent authority, which also came to be rejected by the order dtd. 18/12/2009. Being aggrieved with by the impugned orders passed by the competent authorities dtd. 20/7/2009 (Annexure-I) and order dtd. 18/12/2009 (Annexure-J). The petitioner herein constrained to approach this Court invoking under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and prayed for with the following reliefs.