LAWS(GJH)-2014-12-116

KESHULAL HARLAL NAYI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Decided On December 09, 2014
Keshulal Harlal Nayi Appellant
V/S
STATE OF GUJARAT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioners who are four in number have claimed to be the tenants and occupiers of the shops bearing No. 8/133/1, 8/133/2, 8/133,3 and 8/133/4 at Ambaji Temple and the landlord of the said shops is stated to be respondent No.7 herein.

(2.) IN this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed to quash and set aside the notification under section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ("the old Act") and further prayed to direct the respondent Collector to abide by the resolution of the respondent No.2 Trust dated 1.11.2012 and allot shops No.12, 13,16 and 18 to the petitioners in the Temple Parisar with the compensation as per the resolution . By amendment, the petitioners have added further prayers so as to pray to quash, set aside and modify the award passed under section 11 of the old Act by directing the competent authority to extend the same benefit given to the owner of Final Plot No.41 i.e. to allot the shops to the petitioners in addition to compensation.

(3.) WE have heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Learned Advocate Mr. J.J. Yajnik appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners being tenants of the four shops of Final Plot No. 42, are entitled to the benefits of compensation under law with benefit of allotment of shops given to the other similarly situated persons as per the resolution of the trust. Mr. Yajnik submitted that the Collector is the Chairman of the trust and the trust passed resolution to give shops to the owner of final plot no.41 with compensation of Rs.2501.00 per square ft. for acquiring final plot no.41. Mr. Yajnik submitted that in that very resolution, the plot no.42 whereon the petitioners have their shops as tenants is considered, however, the decision in respect of the petitioners was kept pending. Mr. Yajnik submitted that the petitioners have, thus, become entitled to similar treatment given to the other shop holders whose shops on plot No.41 had gone in acquisition.