(1.) THE appellants have preferred the present appeal challenging the judgement and order dated 30.12.2006 passed in Sessions Case No. 41 of 1998. The appellants original accused were convicted for the offences punishable under sections 302, 324, 323 & 504 read with section 114 of Indian Penal Code as well as sections 37(1) & 135 of B.P. Act.
(2.) IT is the prosecution case that on 05.11.1997, at around
(3.) ON the other hand, Ms. C.M. Shah, learned APP has strongly opposed the contentions raised by the learned advocate for the present appellants and has submitted that the trial court has passed the impugned judgment and order after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material, in the form of oral and documentary evidence, produced before it and hence, no interference is called for and the appeals deserve to be dismissed.