(1.) THESE appeals arise out of the impugned judgment and order and hence, they are decided by this common judgment.
(2.) CRIMINAL Appeal No.297/2011 has been preferred by appellants, original accused no.1 to 4 in Sessions Case No.59/2008, whereby, accused no.2 was convicted for the offences punishable u/s.307, 504 r/w. Section 114 of Indian Penal Code (for short, "the IPC") whereas, accused no.1, 3 and 4 were convicted for the offences punishable u/s.323, 324, 325 and 504 r/w. Section 114 IPC, by judgment and order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Dahod. For conviction u/s.307 IPC, original accused no.2 was sentenced to undergo RI for three years and fine of Rs.3000/ - and in default, SI for a further period of two months. For conviction u/s.323, 324, 325 and 504 r/w. Section 114 IPC, original accused no.1, 3 and 4 were sentenced to undergo RI for one year each and fine of Rs.1000/ - each and in case of default, SI for a further period of two months. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The sentence already undergone by accused persons were given as set -off.
(3.) THE facts in brief are as under;