LAWS(GJH)-2003-6-51

ADAMBHAI SULEMANBHAI DESAI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Decided On June 26, 2003
ADAMBHAI SULEMANBHAI DESAI Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 26/6/1992 passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Revision Application No.TEN.BA. 127/88 & TEN BA.137/88 as well as order dated 17/4/1995 in Review Application No.TEN CA.42/92 and TEN CA.43/92 passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal')

(2.) The petitioner is Chairman of one Desai Cooperative Housing Society Limited and has preferred the petition for and on behalf of the petitioner society registered under the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act. The dispute relates to land bearing survey no.205 admeasuring 4 Acres 31 Gunthas situated in the sim of Dhandhuka town. The said lands were originally of the ownership of a public trust named 'SARVARSHA PIR'. One Musabhai Yakubbhai (since deceased), was the tenant and was cultivating the aforesaid land owned by the trust. Upon death of said Musabhai Yakubbhai the names of his heirs viz. respondent nos. 2 to 5 came to be entered in the revenue records as tenants. Respondent No.5 is the mother of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4. Respondent nos. 6, 7 and 8 are the Vahivatdars i.e. Administrators/Trustees of the aforesaid trust. The lands were Devsthan Inams and, hence, upon the Devsthan Inams Abolition Act coming into force with effect from 15.11.1969, respondent no.5 became deemed purchaser of the said land in light of provisions of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (the Act).

(3.) Accordingly, the Mamlatdar & ALT initiated proceedings under Section 32G of the Act bearing Tenancy Case No. 5/71. After recording the statements of respondent no.5 as well as one of the trustees of the trust, viz. the land owner, declared respondent no.5 as permanent tenant and also determined the purchase price which was mutually agreed upon by the parties during the course of proceedings of Tenancy Case No.5/71. The Mamlatdar & ALT directed the revenue authority to delete the name of the land owners, i.e. the trust and enter the names of respondent nos. 2 to 5 in the revenue records.