KUBERBHAI SHIVDAS Vs. MANANT PURSHOTTAMDAS KALYANDAS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) * * *

(2.) But it was contended by Mr. Vakil that the findings arrived at by the Assistant Charity Commissioner and the entries made by him on the basis of these findings are not binding upon the plaintiffs who claim to be the beneficiaries of the trust. His contention in this respect was two-fold:

(3.) Mr. Vakil submitted that sections 17 18 19 and 20 of the Act deal only with registration of public trusts and not with the rights of parties and therefore sec. 80 of the Act which bars the jurisdiction of Civil Courts does not and cannot oust the jurisdiction of a Civil Court to declare a finding under sections 19 and 20 to be illegal and void if such a finding has been arrived at as a result of fraud.