SAHYOG MINERALS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the purpose of seeking following reliefs :-

(2.) During the course of submissions, learned advocate Mr. Mishra appearing for the petitioner has raised a grievance that though there is a clear indication given in the order passed by the authority on 04.07.2016 indicating that the grace period will have to be considered as indicated in the operative part of the order reflecting on page 24/U, while passing the consequential order on 12.07.2017 reflecting on page 25, the said period has not been considered. As a result of this, the petitioner was left with no other alternate and raised a grievance by way of preferring a specific application on 20.11.2017, but so far, despite repeated representations and requests, the same has not been considered, which has constrained the petitioner to approach this Court by way of preferring the present petition.

(3.) Learned advocate Mr. Mishra, as such, has limited his submission at this stage to the effect that at least, that application which has been submitted on 20.11.2017 be directed to be decided after considering the effect of the orders as indicated above as expeditiously as possible within some time bound schedule which this Court may prescribe and has not submitted any further.