(1.) The moot question that falls for consideration before this Court is :- Whether the appointment of the Sole Arbitrator made by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry, (PHDCCI) in the unilateral proceedings initiated by the respondent is ex-facie invalid and nonest so as to warrant interference by this Court, requiring an appointment of a Sole Arbitrator under the provisions contained in Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
(2.) The factual conspectus as emerging from the pleadings of the parties is as under: <FRM>JUDGEMENT_48_LAWS(GJH)5_2021_1.html</FRM>
(3.) xxx xxx xxx