TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Vs. JAYESHBHAI AMBALAL TADVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned advocate Mr.H.S. Munshaw for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Subramaniam Iyer for the respondent-workman. The matter requires consideration. RULE. Learned advocate Mr.Iyer waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent.

(2.) AT the request of the learned advocate Mr.Munshaw for the petitioner the matter is taken up for final hearing, to which the learned advocate for the respondent-workman has no objection. The petitioner has challenged award passed by the learned Judge, Labour Court No.1, Bharuch in References (LCB) No.175 of 2005 dated 6th April 20111. Whereby the learned Judge was pleased to allow the reference and hold the retrenchment of the respondent-workman as illegal. The learned Judge was pleased to order reinstatement on original post within one month from the date of publication of the award. The learned Judge was also pleased to award 20% back wages and cost of Rs.500/-.

(3.) IN the result this petition fails.