(1.) RULE . Mr.Dipan A. Desai, learned advocate, waives service of notice of Rule for the respondent. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, the petition is being heard and finally decided.
(2.) THE present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus or an appropriate direction, quashing and setting aside the decision dated 01.03.2011, taken by the respondent University, whereby the results of the petitioners of all the subjects for the First Semester Examination, have been cancelled, and the petitioners have been debarred from appearing in the next two Summer/Winter examinations, to be held by the University.
(3.) MR .D.C.Dave, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.Jigar M.Patel, learned advocate for the petitioners, has made the following submissions: